JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 23, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Castillo Negrete Luis Ramon·Respondent Inpec

✓
Topic · hard data
Competencia De Tutela Por El Lugar Donde Ocurrieron Los Hechos.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia De Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrieron los hechos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de lo actuado a partir de la providencia proferida por el Juzgado de la referencia, la Corte argumentó que al negarse a fallar, el Juez viola el debido proceso, el derecho de acceso a la justicia y la esencia de la acción de tutela, luego su determinación constituye una nulidad insubsanable.

En consecuencia, ordenó devolver el expediente al referido Juzgado para que pronuncie sentencia sobre la tutela instaurada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declárase la nulidad de lo actuado a partir de la providencia del 18 de julio de 1995 proferida por el Juzgado 35 Penal Municipal de Medellín.
  2. SEGUNDO. Devuélvase el expediente al referido Juzgado para que pronuncie sentencia en la acción de tutela instaurada por Luis Ramón Castillo Negrete.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.